[Dnssec-deployment] Size of dlv.isc.org [was: Re:DLV and in-addr.arpa]

Chris Thompson cet1 at cam.ac.uk
Tue Jun 14 13:21:19 EDT 2011


On Jun 14 2011, Steve Crocker wrote:

>1. It would be interesting to track the size and use of the DLV over time.
>   We may learn something about the adoption process.

I have been tracking the zones with DLV records published in dlv.isc.org for
the last 34 months or so, in a sporadic way. Raw counts are below - I also
have the actual zone lists on each date if anyone wants them. Presumably
ISC have much better data.

  113 2008-07-30   563 2009-06-09  1159 2010-02-25  1808 2010-10-31
  150 2008-08-08   588 2009-06-17  1189 2010-03-03  1818 2010-11-05
  151 2008-08-27   592 2009-06-20  1204 2010-03-13  1824 2010-11-13
  162 2008-09-19   603 2009-06-26  1218 2010-03-22  1820 2010-11-18
  163 2008-09-23   603 2009-07-02  1217 2010-03-25  1831 2010-11-26
  204 2008-09-24   606 2009-07-06  1219 2010-04-06  1838 2010-12-03
  209 2008-10-06   610 2009-07-08  1241 2010-04-14  1841 2010-12-10
  214 2008-10-13   686 2009-07-13  1261 2010-04-20  1853 2010-12-16
  219 2008-11-15   761 2009-07-17  1274 2010-04-25  1868 2010-12-22
  226 2008-11-26   777 2009-07-23  1337 2010-05-05  1849 2011-01-03
  241 2008-12-03   791 2009-07-30  1389 2010-05-12  1861 2011-01-13
  242 2008-12-10   792 2009-08-05  1428 2010-05-19  1873 2011-01-17
  243 2008-12-14   794 2009-08-12  1443 2010-05-25  1893 2011-01-27
  247 2008-12-17   802 2009-08-29  1499 2010-06-02  1890 2011-01-31
  312 2009-01-02   807 2009-09-04  1488 2010-06-08  1866 2011-02-05
  316 2009-01-14   827 2009-09-11  1495 2010-06-15  1884 2011-02-11
  321 2009-01-18   830 2009-09-21  1483 2010-06-22  1892 2011-02-17
  322 2009-01-27   799 2009-09-30  1579 2010-06-29  1918 2011-02-24
  328 2009-01-31   805 2009-10-08  1636 2010-07-04  1931 2011-03-02
  339 2009-02-22   857 2009-10-17  1643 2010-07-10  1945 2011-03-09
  352 2009-02-24   852 2009-10-23  1651 2010-07-16  1897 2011-03-15
  433 2009-03-14   861 2009-11-03  1600 2010-07-23  2160 2011-03-20
  437 2009-03-18   975 2009-11-10  1608 2010-07-29  2157 2011-03-26
  446 2009-03-21   996 2009-11-16  1604 2010-08-03  2152 2011-04-01
  458 2009-03-26  1003 2009-11-22  1616 2010-08-09  2178 2011-04-08
  501 2009-04-02   998 2009-11-30  1640 2010-08-17  2173 2011-04-16
  510 2009-04-14  1015 2009-12-07  1652 2010-08-23  2177 2011-04-26
  535 2009-04-18  1031 2009-12-13  1653 2010-08-26  2192 2011-05-02
  536 2009-04-21  1041 2009-12-20  1646 2010-09-01  1836 2011-05-04
  537 2009-04-27  1051 2010-01-03  1649 2010-09-09  1890 2011-05-11
  537 2009-04-30  1070 2010-01-10  1712 2010-09-23  1891 2011-05-17
  540 2009-05-01  1074 2010-01-17  1721 2010-09-29  2039 2011-05-24
  540 2009-05-07  1109 2010-01-24  1736 2010-10-05  1866 2011-05-31
  556 2009-05-13  1126 2010-01-31  1759 2010-10-11  1879 2011-06-07
  573 2009-05-27  1128 2010-02-08  1779 2010-10-18  1891 2011-06-13
  556 2009-06-03  1136 2010-02-14  1789 2010-10-24

Some of the big jumps are from when the RIPE and ARIN trust anchor
repositories were imported, extended, and eventually dropped. The
fall between 2011-05-24 and 2011-05-31 is when the *.de zones were
excluded.

-- 
Chris Thompson               University of Cambridge Computing Service,
Email: cet1 at ucs.cam.ac.uk    New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QH,
Phone: +44 1223 334715       United Kingdom.


More information about the Dnssec-deployment mailing list