[Dnssec-deployment] CAT is signed
SM
sm at resistor.net
Tue Jun 29 13:57:37 EDT 2010
At 08:36 29-06-10, Eric Osterweil wrote:
>I am, actually, quite on board with raising a flag when there is a
>PMTU problem. However, I can't agree that ANY queries constitute a
>problem. As I pointed out before, the behavior of transactions
>surrounding this record are not very representative of
>others. There was a rather long discussion on either the dnsext or
>dnsop mailing list that discussed the relative merits (or lack
>thereof) of using ANY queries. It was some time ago, but it might
>be good background reading here.
http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/namedroppers.2009/msg00856.html
Regards,
-sm
More information about the Dnssec-deployment
mailing list