[Dnssec-deployment] CAT is signed

SM sm at resistor.net
Tue Jun 29 13:57:37 EDT 2010


At 08:36 29-06-10, Eric Osterweil wrote:
>I am, actually, quite on board with raising a flag when there is a 
>PMTU problem.  However, I can't agree that ANY queries constitute a 
>problem.  As I pointed out before, the behavior of transactions 
>surrounding this record are not very representative of 
>others.  There was a rather long discussion on either the dnsext or 
>dnsop mailing list that discussed the relative merits (or lack 
>thereof) of using ANY queries.  It was some time ago, but it might 
>be good background reading here.

http://www.ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/namedroppers.2009/msg00856.html

Regards,
-sm 



More information about the Dnssec-deployment mailing list