[Dnssec-deployment] CAT is signed

[Ray Bellis]

> 
> Why should one have to take corrective action in the first place
> when TCP is part of the basic specification from day one?   RFC
> 1123 said that there would be a day when the data set is too big
> for UDP and that you would need to provide service over TCP when
> that day came.  For .CAT that day has come.
> 

FWIW, draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements is very nearly through the IESG.

[It passed IESG vote, and we're just agreeing a couple of minor changes].

Ray