[dnssec-deployment] About "no validation" for DNS root signing strategy

Olafur Gudmundsson ogud at ogud.com
Tue Oct 13 11:40:00 EDT 2009


At 14:46 09/10/2009, Jakob Schlyter wrote:
>On 9 okt 2009, at 17.37, Howard Eland wrote:
>
>>These early adopters will necessarily read the first announcement,
>>or else they wouldn't know to turn validation on in the first
>>place.  Make _that_ announcement as clear as possible as to what is
>>going on.  I doubt there will be a massive validation light-up in
>>the first 6 months - specially if this occurs before .COM is signed,
>>so the impact is currently as low as it can be.  It is a foregone
>>conclusion that the root needs to be signed, and this approach
>>provides the opportunity to measure the impact of DNSSEC on the root
>>operators.
>
>not to mention they have to configure a key that looks something like
>this:
>
>.  IN DNSKEY 256 3 5 ( AwEAAa++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>                        ++THIS/KEY/AN/INVALID/KEY/AND/SHOULD
>                        /NOT/BE/USED/CONTACT/ROOTSIGN/AT/ICA
>                        NN/DOT/ORG/FOR/MORE/INFORMATION+++++
>                        ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>                        ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>                        ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>                        ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>                        ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>                        ++++++++++++++++++++++/=) ; Key ID = 6477
>
>(btw yes, that is a valid key)

Based on my interpretation this is not a valid key as it has a
covert channel in the last byte :-)
You can fix that by changing the last character from / to A.


>I believe someone who deliberately configures such a key might have
>other problems, but what do I know...

The case you are ignoring is:
Well what if someone calculates a DS record over the key and then
distributes that DS as a trust anchor ?
.       IN       DS     6477 5 
2      3BF069F2AA69561AC63028135E526CBE27675E931C87E7F1DAB53A4914CDDDAE
.       IN       DS     6477 5 
1        464F72094BD43ECB11681D3662F408835687B839

         Olafur




More information about the Dnssec-deployment mailing list