[dnssec-deployment] Plans to sign arpa, in-addr.arpa, ip6.arpa?
jabley at hopcount.ca
Sat Nov 7 17:10:46 EST 2009
On 2009-11-08, at 07:07, Joe Abley wrote:
> On 2009-11-06, at 21:42, Chris Thompson wrote:
>> Maybe I've missed something, but among all the ICANN/Verisign
>> of the planned schedule for signing the root zone, there doesn't
>> seem to
>> be any mention of "arpa", "in-addr.arpa" (both served from the root
>> or "ip6.arpa" (not so served, but owned by ICANN).
> You're right that the work to sign the root zone has not included
> direct treatment of the work required to sign ARPA, IN-ADDR.ARPA and
> Work continues amongst the various involved orgnisations on
> arranging for ARPA, IN-ADDR.ARPA and IP6.ARPA to be signed. The
> operational community should expect to hear details just as soon as
> there are details to be shared.
I sent that from the address with which I'm subscribed to this list,
which was perhaps a little unhelpful for what amounts to an
(admittedly short and unsubstantive) status update. I work for ICANN,
and am involved in the work referred to above, in case that helps give
my comments some context.
More information about the Dnssec-deployment