[dnssec-deployment] DNSSEC deployment hurdles

[Patrik Fältström]

On 28 aug 2009, at 11.59, bert hubert wrote:

> I find it worrying that these numbers (which are well known to the
> DNSSEC community), combined with the OARC results, are not seeing
> wider discussion here (or anywhere public).

One of the reasons I think is that for example in Sweden we do not see  
any such problems with fragmentation. Possibly because the responses  
are not that large, or that the situation is not as bad as the  
netalyzr data says.

I do not know.

But, if we had problems with 14% of the dnssec signed responses for  
signed zones, then that would be known.

    paf

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://dnssec-deployment.org/pipermail/dnssec-deployment/attachments/20090828/3ddddc82/attachment.bin