[dnssec-deployment] meeting announcement: 18 June 2008

[Edward Lewis]

At 9:51 -0400 6/18/08, Suresh Krishnaswamy wrote:
>Slides should be attached

Comments on those slides, other than comments I have already made on the paper.

Slide 4

TARs "will reduce the need for parent zones to support DNSSEC."

Judging from my experience, DNSSEC is just not being adopted.  TARs, 
or the "threat of them" are not the roadblocks.

These two bullets are mutually at odds:

- Zones that currently publish SEP key information in the TAR will 
not see a need for switching over to using the parent

- TAR registration represents an additional burden for the zone owner

If it is a burden, there is a need to switch.  Changes are made for 
two reasons - increase revenue or reduce costs.  Removing a burden is 
a cost reduction (all other things being equal)

Slide 9

Multiple instances - if anyone runs any TAR, it will have multiple 
instances.  That's a given.  You can't achieve reliability with just 
one or even just two instances of a service.

-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis                                                +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar

Never confuse activity with progress.  Activity pays more.