[dnssec-deployment] meeting announcement: 18 June 2008
Edward Lewis
Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz
Tue Jun 10 19:17:54 EDT 2008
At 16:36 -0400 6/10/08, Steve Crocker wrote:
>I have trouble believing a TLD operator would set up a DLV but not be
>willing to run DNSSEC.
(Let's not split hairs to say it would be the TLD regulator making the call.)
Some possible reasons for having a DLV without running DNSSEC...
1) Not risking the service level agreements for existing services.
2) Having a way to judge the demand for DNSSEC without the large investment.
3) Being able to get some development experience in without upsetting ops.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar
Never confuse activity with progress. Activity pays more.
More information about the Dnssec-deployment
mailing list