[dnssec-deployment] DNSSEC for ENUM
lutz at iks-jena.de
Mon Jan 21 05:58:36 EST 2008
* Phil Regnauld wrote:
> Lutz Donnerhacke (lutz) writes:
>> I'd like to inform you, that I try to get DNSSEC as a requirement for an
>> upcoming ENUM seal. The risk of modified data (by hotels which want to
>> prohibit VoIP or gouvernmental intercepting dreams) is too high for
>> unverified information. OTOH ENUM is an area where DNSSEC drawbacks
>> (bogus zones caused by mismaintainance) does not harm that much due to the
>> POTS fallback.
> Interesting, do you have anything that outlines the advantages
> of DNSSEC in this respect, besides what you've just mentioned ?
No, it's initial thinking ;-)
More information about the Dnssec-deployment