[dnssec-deployment] meeting announcement: 11 May 2005

[bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com]

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 04:12:03PM +0200, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote:
>      -- Regarding Issue 8 from the DNSSEC Deployment Roadmap:
>     
>     <...>
>     
>         * Jaap Akkerhuis
>     
>           Jaap Akkerhuis noted that NL Netlabs had a simulation of CPU and
>           storage requirements for DNSSEC.  Jaap agreed to get some material
>           on the NL Netlabs activities for review.
> 
> 
> It turns out that there is less available then I thought. There is
> a talk about adding DNSSEC support in nsd which also makes comments
> about the resources in general dnssec needs (by the server) and has
> some measurements comparing performance with and without dnssec,
> but the with/without dnssec comparison is for nsd only  (See
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-47/presentations/ripe47-dn-dnssec-nsd.pdf)
> 
> I had hoped to do some new measurements in cluding bind comparisons
> in the 4 weeks mentioned above, but my day job got in the way.
> 
> And remember, as said before, Olaf has some decent numbers in his
> introduction course.
>     
> 	jaap
> 
> #############################################################

	there are some preliminary numbers from at least one other source,
	it should be presented at the upcoming NANOG... or at least 
	releasable then.  

--bill