[dnssec-deployment] Registry software systems
Jaap Akkerhuis
jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Jan 19 12:50:05 EST 2005
We also need to account for resellers (just to pick a document
highlighting the relationship and it's fragility -
http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg04382.html).
I just wanted to describe this from a reistar point, but you are right,
the for the general public resellers, registrar etc. are all the same.
They just want a name.
RFC 3632 is newer for RRP, don't know if it's the latest.
Yup. Typo here.
I'd label this 2.3, and the next 2.4. To non-trivialize the comment,
registries can be divided as in #1 and can also be (orthogonally)
divided amongst interface types as in #2. Also - registries may do
multiple protocols .
... and interfaces. DNS.be has epp, www, and old mail template system.
E.g, I know that APNIC uses a X.509-cert secured Web Portal, I
believe/think in addition to templates.
Probably. I guess, is all shows, that there is no generic method to
make registry, registar, reseller etc. systems DNSSEC ready.
jaap
More information about the Dnssec-deployment
mailing list