[dnssec-deployment] Registry software systems

Jaap Akkerhuis jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Jan 19 12:50:05 EST 2005


    
    We also need to account for resellers (just to pick a document 
    highlighting the relationship and it's fragility - 
    http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg04382.html).
    
I just wanted to describe this from a reistar point, but you are right,
the for the general public resellers, registrar etc. are all the same.
They just want a name.
    
    RFC 3632 is newer for RRP, don't know if it's the latest.

Yup. Typo here.
    
    
    I'd label this 2.3, and the next 2.4.  To non-trivialize the comment, 
    registries can be divided as in #1 and can also be (orthogonally) 
    divided amongst interface types as in #2.  Also - registries may do 
    multiple protocols .

... and interfaces. DNS.be has epp, www, and old mail template system.
    
    E.g, I know that APNIC uses a X.509-cert secured Web Portal, I 
    believe/think in addition to templates.
    
Probably. I guess, is all shows, that there is no generic  method to
make registry, registar, reseller etc. systems DNSSEC ready.

	jaap



More information about the Dnssec-deployment mailing list